Kde by v Harry Potterovi šel čaroděj nebo čarodějnice na nečarodějskou nemoc nebo zranění? [duplikát]

2

Vím, že St. Mungo's léčí nemoci a zranění způsobená magií. A co zranění nebo nemoci, které nejsou způsobeny magií? Jdou k muklovskému lékaři nebo nemocnici k léčbě? Příklad: Dumbledore a Harry nosí brýle, kam jdou, aby zkoumali jejich oči? Myslel bych, že kouzelníci / čarodějnice, kteří jsou součástí lidstva, by také dostali mudlovské choroby.

    
dané dean1957 10.09.2017 18:33

1 odpověď

4

Oni by používali základní kouzlo, aby je opravili. Žádný dlouhý pobyt v nemocnici by nebyl nezbytný.

I pondered the issue of illness and disability very early in the creation of Harry's world. Did wizards catch colds? Could they cure illnesses that baffled Muggles? Were there disabled wizards? What were the limits of wizarding medicine, or could it fix anything?

(...)

I decided that, broadly speaking, wizards would have the power to correct or override 'mundane' nature, but not 'magical' nature. Therefore, a wizard could catch anything a Muggle might catch, but he could cure all of it; he would also comfortably survive a scorpion sting that might kill a Muggle, whereas he might die if bitten by a Venomous Tentacula. Similarly, bones broken in non-magical accidents such as falls or fist fights can be mended by magic, but the consequences of curses or backfiring magic could be serious, permanent or life-threatening. This is the reason that Gilderoy Lockhart, victim of his own mangled Memory Charm, has permanent amnesia, why the poor Longbottoms remain permanently damaged by magical torture, and why Mad-Eye Moody had to resort to a wooden leg and a magical eye when the originals were irreparably damaged in a wizards' battle; Luna Lovegood's mother, Pandora, died when one of her own experimental spells went wrong, and Bill Weasley is irreversibly scarred after his meeting with Fenrir Greyback.

Pottermore: Illness and Disability

    
odpověděl 10.09.2017 18:44

Přečtěte si další otázky týkající se značek